Crime Stoppers offers reward for information on Armani Ford shooting | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Crime Stoppers offers reward for information on Armani Ford shooting

Madasyn Czebiniak
1167863_web1_PTR-Clairton05-121512
Clairton’s Armani Ford carries for a touchdown at the PIAA state championship game against Dunmore in 2012 in Hershey.

A reward is being offered to anyone with information about a shooting that killed a former Clairton High School football star in April.

At about 6 p.m., April 26, police found Armani Ford, 23, face down in the rear yard of 810 Vankirk Street in Clairton. He was shot in the chest and died at the scene.

Clairton Police were dispatched to the area of Vankirk Street for a report of a man being shot, a Pittsburgh Crime Stoppers news release said Thursday.

When officers arrived, they discovered a grey Nissan SUV sitting on Apricot Way behind 810 Vankirk St. The car’s engine was running, and the passenger side door was open, the release said. There was a bullet hole in the windshield that appeared to show that there was a gunshot fired through the window from the inside of the car to the outside.

Anyone with information concerning the investigation is asked to call the Allegheny County Police Tip Line at 1-833-ALL-TIPS (1-833-255-8477). A reward of up to $1,000 is being offered for information leading to the arrest and prosecution of any individuals responsible for this homicide.

Callers may remain anonymous.

Ford was a quarterback at Clairton High during the program’s 63-game winning streak. The Bears won four straight PIAA championships during his tenure, the last being the 2012 season.

He played on the same Clairton team as Bengals wide receiver Tyler Boyd.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.