DA seeks gag order in case against man accused of killing Pittsburgh police officer | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

DA seeks gag order in case against man accused of killing Pittsburgh police officer

Bob Bauder
1662210_web1_ptr-CalvinHallWeb-072019
Calvin Hall is pictured in this September 2017 photo provided by Point Park University. Calvin Hall is pictured in this September 2017 photo provided by Point Park University.

Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. said his office has filed for a gag order in the case of a man accused in the July murder of an off-duty Pittsburgh police officer.

The DA’s office has charged Christian Bey, 30, of Wilkinsburg with homicide and three firearms violations in connection with the July 14 shooting of Officer Calvin Hall, 36, in Homewood. Hall died three days later.

Zappala said the gag order is intended to limit public comment by officials about the case and preserve the county’s ability to seat an impartial jury consisting of county residents. The DA’s office is seeking the death penalty.

The DA said one of the reasons for seeking the order, which was filed Tuesday, was an interview that attorney Carmen Robinson, who represents Bey, gave to KDKA Radio in August.

Robinson could not be reached for comment.

”There was too much discussion about the case,” he said. “Obviously, the defendant is innocent until he is proven guilty. We don’t want to compromise that or deal with juries from outside of Allegheny County.”

Bey is being held without bail in the Allegheny County Jail in Pittsburgh.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.