Demolition of Pittsburgh buildings makes way for North Side development |

Demolition of Pittsburgh buildings makes way for North Side development

Bob Bauder
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
These three buildings along Pittsburgh’s North Avenue are being demolished by the Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority to make way for a new residential building.

Demolishing three vacant buildings in Pittsburgh has generated considerable controversy in recent years over plans for redevelopment of the North Side’s Garden Theater Block.

The latest plan for the block, along North Avenue between Federal and Reddour streets, includes demolition of the three buildings and construction of a new one proposed by Downtown-based Trek Development. The development would cost about $16 million and include 60 apartments and ground-floor retail space.

Workers were tearing down the buildings last week.

The Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority, which owns the block, previously granted Trek exclusive negotiating rights.

Some residents have argued that demolition would destroy a significant part of North Side history.

Others supported the project, saying they’ve waited years for the city to redevelop the blighted block and sparring over the three buildings only delayed the project.

Stephen Pascal, who splits time between residences in New York and the North Side, said the demolition destroyed what remains of an old commercial district on Federal Street.

“After two decades of committed and creative efforts by so many to save these buildings, their senseless demolition is the outcome of self-serving mismanagement by the authorities regrettably entrusted with saving this block,” he said.

Trek originally had plans to incorporate facades of the three buildings into a residential building, but a court challenge filed by Pascal and another North Side resident stopped the project.

URA Executive Director Robert Rubinstein said demolition of 4, 6 and 8 W. North Ave. was the only economically viable option left for improving the block.

“The Urban Redevelopment Authority is a strong advocate and practitioner of historic preservation,” he said. “After more than two decades and a half dozen developers, we have been unable to arrive at economically viable means to save these buildings. They had become a public safety hazard to the neighborhood and an impediment to the businesses operating in this vicinity.”

North Side civic groups and local preservationists, including the Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, supported the demolition.

Steve Riffe, 58, a Central North Side resident, said it was time to tear down the buildings.

“That particular corner, it needed something other than what was there,” he said. “Those buildings were just sitting there, and they were dangerous.”

Bob Bauder is a
Tribune-Review staff writer.
You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.