Developer of Westinghouse facility in Churchill charged with asbestos violations | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Developer of Westinghouse facility in Churchill charged with asbestos violations

Jamie Martines
1743568_web1_ptr-asbestoscharges-100119
Tribune-Review
George Westinghouse Research and Technology Park in Churchill.

A Mt. Lebanon developer has been charged with illegally removing and dumping asbestos from the former Westinghouse facility in Churchill, according to paperwork filed by U.S. Attorney Scott Brady in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Friday.

Vikas Jain, 47, is charged with one count of knowingly violating work practice standards of the federal Clean Air Act. If convicted, he could face up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

Court documents did not list an attorney representing Jain. He could not be immediately reached for comment.

“In this case, an unscrupulous developer is charged with illegally removing and dumping asbestos in violation of the Clean Air Act, thereby compromising not only our region’s air quality, but also the health of the workers hired to perform the removal activity,” Brady said in a statement.

Jain purchased the former Westinghouse facility in May 2012 for $913,500 with the intention of developing the facility for commercial and residential use, according to court documents and Allegheny County real estate records.

In 2017, Jain directed workers to remove materials — floor tiles, mastic and pipe insulation — containing asbestos from two buildings at the facility, federal prosecutors contend. Jain is also accused of directing workers to rent floor grinders, which were allegedly later used to remove floor tiles and mastic.

Jain did not apply for or obtain a permit from the Allegheny County Health Department for the asbestos removal activity, according to court documents.

In addition, workers allegedly did not wear proper protective clothing or respirators. The debris was allegedly placed in black trash bags and dumped in a dumpster at a residential property.

Those trash bags were taken to a local landfill that was not qualified to receive the asbestos-contaminated waste, according to court documents.

The Allegheny County Health Department fined Jain and his development company, Churchill Community Developments LP, $1.4 million in 2017 for improperly removing and disposing of materials contaminated with asbestos from the facility.

That fine has not yet been paid, and an appeal of the fine and accompanying enforcement order issued by the health department is being considered by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, health department Spokesman Ryan Scarpino said.

The health department did not comment on the federal charges.

State Sen. Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills, had previously worked to secure over $2.5 million in state grants to fund projects at the site.

Those funds were never disbursed due to concerns about asbestos removal raised by Allegheny County, Costa said Monday.

“It was put on hold, and the money is still sitting there, no one used it,” Costa said, adding that he hopes the funds will be used for another project at the site with a different developer.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.