Fire that damaged Strip District warehouse considered suspicious | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Fire that damaged Strip District warehouse considered suspicious

1742355_web1_ptr-stripdistrictfire003-100119
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Firefighters respond to a warehouse fire along Smallman Street between 16th and 17th Street in the Strip District, on Monday, Sept. 30, 2019.
1742355_web1_ptr-stripdistrictfire002-100119
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Firefighters respond to a warehouse fire along Smallman Street between 16th and 17th Street in the Strip District, on Monday, Sept. 30, 2019.
1742355_web1_ptr-stripdistrictfire004-100119
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Firefighters respond to a warehouse fire along Smallman Street between 16th and 17th Street in the Strip District, on Monday, Sept. 30, 2019.
1742355_web1_ptr-stripdistrictfire005-100119
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Firefighters respond to a warehouse fire along Smallman Street between 16th and 17th Street in the Strip District, on Monday, Sept. 30, 2019.
1742355_web1_ptr-stripdistrictfire001-100119
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Firefighters respond to a warehouse fire along Smallman Street between 16th and 17th Street in the Strip District, on Monday, Sept. 30, 2019.

The cause of a fire that damaged a Pittsburgh warehouse is suspicious in nature, city fire investigators determined Monday afternoon.

The fire early Monday at the Strip District warehouse caused a large amount of damage to the building, Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto said.

The warehouse is part of McCaffery Interests’ $100 million redevelopment project in the Strip District.

“This was a very hard fire to be able to control because the interior of the building is all wood,” Peduto said.

Although the damage was severe, it doesn’t appear as if it compromised the structure of the building, Peduto said.

“This is simply a matter of restoration,” the mayor said.

No further details on the cause have been released.

The fire was reported shortly before 4:40 a.m. at the building between 16th and 17th streets along Smallman Street. It went to three alarms.

Smoke or steam occasionally billowed out as firefighters treated hotspots hours later.

McCaffery is expected to spend $50 million redeveloping the warehouse for offices and shops. The warehouse is across Smallman Street from the Produce Terminal, where McCaffery expects to spend another $50 million in redevelopment.

Dan McCaffery, the company’s CEO, said he hoped the fire would only be a “minor setback.”

It was too early to say how the fire would impact the development, he said. It won’t have any effect on the plans for the Produce Terminal

There was construction happening in and around the warehouse. The interior of the warehouse appeared to be gutted. The sidewalk was already closed and fenced in for construction.

Some workers who were in the area this morning said electricity was out on Smallman Street from Colville Street down to at least the 17th Street block, where the warehouse that had the fire is located.

Staff reporter Tom Davidson contributed to this report. Megan Tomasic and Jamie Martines are Tribune-Review staff writers. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter @MeganTomasic. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter @Jamie_Martines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.