Crews remove stuck garbage truck with giant crane near Birmingham Bridge | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Crews remove stuck garbage truck with giant crane near Birmingham Bridge

1775126_web1_ptr-sunkentruck3-100819
Courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Safety Department
A crane lifts a garbage truck that partially fell through a concrete parking pad in the 2400 block of Fifth Avenue in Pittsburgh around 7:30 a.m. on Monday, Oct. 7, 2019.
1775126_web1_ptr-sunkentruck002-100819
Courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Safety Department
A garbage truck fell through a concrete parking pad in Pittsburgh on Monday, Oct. 7, 2019. A crane was used to remove the truck.

Crews used a large crane Monday night to lift an 80,000-pound garbage truck that got stuck earlier in the day after falling through a concrete parking area just off Fifth Avenue near the Birmingham Bridge in Pittsburgh.

The complicated preparation and lift by Allegheny Crane Rental took more than eight hours, according to Pittsburgh Public Safety.

Parts of Fifth Avenue and the Boulevard of the Allies were closed for several hours while crews lifted the truck free and assessed damage.

Concrete under the rear end of a Vogel Disposal Service truck broke, according to photos posted to Twitter by the Pittsburgh Public Safety Department.

No one from Vogel could be reached Monday.

Pittsburgh Public Safety officials were not immediately available for comment.

Staff writer Natasha Lindstrom contributed to this report. Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.