Duquesne Light grant will help restore historic Pittsburgh park | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Duquesne Light grant will help restore historic Pittsburgh park

Bob Bauder
1111155_web1_ptr-northsidefountain212-041919
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
The newly-added fountain at Allegheny Commons on the Northside on April 17, 2019. A newly-added fountain at Allegheny Commons Park on Pittsburgh’s North Side.

A grant from Duquesne Light Co. will help fund the next phase of restoration of a historic park in Pittsburgh’s North Side.

The Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy announced Friday that Duquesne Light’s donation of nearly $500,000 would be used along with a state grant would pay for restoration of the park’s North Promenade along North Avenue.

It will pay for new park paths, LED lighting, benches, garbage receptacles and other amenities, according to the conservancy.

Officials announced the grant Thursday evening during a dedication ceremony for a new park fountain recently installed at the corner of North and Cedar avenues.

Allegheny Commons was built in 1867 in what was then Allegheny City, which was annexed by Pittsburgh in 1907. North Side groups including the Allegheny Commons Initiative and Northside Leadership Conference have been working with the conservancy for years to restore the park to its Victorian splendor.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.