Duquesne man on trial for supplying fentanyl that led to fatal overdose | TribLIVE.com

Duquesne man on trial for supplying fentanyl that led to fatal overdose

Tom Davidson
Courtesy of Allegheny County Jail
Tyree Marce Saunders

A Duquesne man accused of providing the drugs that resulted in the 2017 overdose death of a 28-year-old Clairton man is on trial this week in Allegheny County court.

Tyree Marce Saunders, 27, is accused of providing 20 stamp bags of drugs that were sold as heroin to Jeremy Clark, who overdosed on March 22, 2017, in Clairton, according to a criminal complaint.

Clairton police said they used Clark’s cellphone to identify Saunders and arrange for another drug deal. Saunders was taken into custody at a pizza parlor in Duquesne, where police said they found heroin on him. They also took possession of his phone, which showed the text messages he exchanged with police and Clark, according to the criminal complaint.

Lab tests of the drugs found on Saunders and toxicology reports from Clark’s autopsy revealed it was pure fentanyl that was being sold by Saunders, according to the criminal complaint.

Saunders is being tried on charges including drug delivery resulting in death, possession of drugs and criminal use of a phone. The case is being heard by Judge David Cashman.

“I don’t believe they have the right guy,” Joe Horowitz, Saunders attorney, said.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.