Duquesne man who bought 23 guns for felons gets nearly 3 years in prison | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Duquesne man who bought 23 guns for felons gets nearly 3 years in prison

Natasha Lindstrom
1683164_web1_GunSingle

A Duquesne man will spend almost three years behind bars for a straw-buyer scheme that helped get at least 23 guns to felons prohibited from owning firearms, federal prosecutors said Monday.

Khalil Armstrong, 27, also must spend three years on probation after his release from federal prison, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

Chief U.S. District Judge Mark R. Hornak imposed the sentence in federal court in Pittsburgh following Armstrong’s convictions for conspiring to make false statements to acquire firearms. Armstrong lied on federal registration forms and to the licensed firearms dealer when he said he was purchasing the guns for himself, Brady said.

In January and February of last year, Armstrong plotted with co-defendant Melvin Bowles to have Armstrong make gun purchases for Bowles and others who wanted guns but couldn’t buy them legally, prosecutors said.

Bowles — who is prohibited from owning guns as a felon — previously was sentenced to 14 months of time served.

Investigators found and seized one of the firearms illegally purchased and distributed by Armstrong during a search of the house where Bowles lives on Feb. 15, 2018.

The 22 other guns he purchased for others have not been found, Brady said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy M. Lanni prosecuted the case with help from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Project Safe Neighborhoods.

RELATED: 2 former Duquesne men plead guilty to illegal gun purchases

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.