Duquesne teen sentenced to minimum 20 years for two shootings, one fatal | TribLIVE.com

Duquesne teen sentenced to minimum 20 years for two shootings, one fatal

Megan Guza

An Allegheny County judge Tuesday sentenced 17-year-old Thomas McKissick to at least 20 years in prison on charges of homicide and attempted homicide that stemmed from two separate 2017 incidents in Duquesne, according to the District Attorney’s Office.

The first incident happened Oct. 10, 2017, when a 16-year-old boy met with McKissick at the Polish Hill Baseball Field, according to the criminal complaint. The victim intended to by marijuana from McKissick, then 16, but McKissick pulled a gun and shot the teen in the neck.

His friends drove him to UPMC McKeesport, and he survived his wounds, according to the complaint. He identified McKissick as the person who shot him.

A day later, 15-year-old Lezra Rice was shot and killed in Duquesne near a pathway known as Nickly Hollow, just north of Williams Street, according to the criminal complaint. A search of Rice’s cell phone showed he’d been communicating with McKissick just prior to the shooting.

From McKissick’s home, also in Duquesne, investigators collected a box of .45-caliber ammunition that matched the casings found at both the baseball field at the scene of Rice’s shooting, according to the complaint.

McKissick pleaded guilty in front of Judge Alex Bicket to third-degree murder and attempted homicide. In exchange for the plea, the District Attorney’s Office agreed to 20 to 40 years in prison.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.