Elizabeth Bridge reopened after structural concerns addressed | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Elizabeth Bridge reopened after structural concerns addressed

Michael DiVittorio
1735262_web1_ptr-elizabethbridgework-012919
Tribune-Review
The Elizabeth Bridge has been reopened less than a day after it was closed due to structural concerns.

The Elizabeth Bridge has been reopened about a day after it was closed due to structural concerns.

PennDOT closed the bridge, on Route 51 between Elizabeth and West Elizabeth, Thursday afternoon due to a failed temporary structural support bracket being utilized for hanger cable replacements.

Crews and consulting engineers worked to design and install a secondary hanger system in the problem area.

Officials inspected and conducted multiple tests on the bridge, and decided to reopen it around 6 p.m. Friday.

“I want to thank motorists for their patience during the bridge closure,” said Cheryl Moon-Sirianni, PennDOT District 11 district executive for engineering. “As the public’s well-being is our highest priority, the department believed the best course of action was to close the bridge until we were completely confident that traffic could safely use the structure.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.