Employees of shuttered Pittsburgh tax filing franchises plead guilty | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Employees of shuttered Pittsburgh tax filing franchises plead guilty

Chuck Biedka
1157029_web1_WEB-pittsburgh-federal-court-building
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

At least three former tax preparers for former Cititax Refund Co. franchises in Pittsburgh have pleaded guilty to filing false tax returns that prosecutors allege cheated the Internal Revenue Services out of millions of dollars.

The latest charged is Lakisha K. Pinkney, 42, previously of Pittsburgh.

Pinkney, now of Eastpointe, Mich., pleaded guilty this week to one count of filing false tax returns involving about $626,000 in false federal tax refunds for customers, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office.

She worked at Cititax Tax Refund in Pittsburgh from 2010 to 2013, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

There were at least three Pittsburgh-area franchises before the IRS ordered the franchises shutdown in 2016, prosecutors said. The businesses were previously known as Instant Tax Service. Their names changed to Cititax Refund Co. in 2012, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

Two other former Cititax Refund Co. tax preparers recently entered guilty pleas.

On May 6, Daniel K. Hamilton of Arnold pleaded guilty to one count of preparing false returns for others.

Between 2010 and 2016, Hamilton prepared federal income tax returns which requested more than $2 million in false Earned Income Tax Credit refunds for taxpayers.

On April 30, Quincy K. Denson of Clairton pleaded guilty to two counts of filing of false federal income tax returns. An amount wasn’t available.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.