Eugene DePasquale makes run for Congress official |
Politics Election

Eugene DePasquale makes run for Congress official

Paul Guggenheimer
Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale (Trib photo)

State Auditor General Eugene DePasquale is hoping to leverage his tenure as the state’s elected fiscal watchdog to make a run for U.S. Congress.

DePasquale made the official announcement on social media Sunday after a week of reports that he had told Democratic Party leaders he planned to run for Congress in the 10th District. The seat is held by four-term Republican Rep. Scott Perry.

“Tomorrow I file my paperwork for Congress to shake up Washington, D.C., and make it work for all Americans,” DePasquale said on Twitter.

The 10th District includes the cities of Harrisburg and York and has about 23,000 more registered Republican voters than Democrats.

Perry, an Iraq War veteran, narrowly won re-election last November over first-time candidate George Scott. The victory margin was less than 3 percentage points, providing encouragement to DePasquale that he can beat Perry in 2020.

Another incentive for DePasquale is that he is in his second four-year term as auditor general and is constitutionally barred from serving a third. According to the Auditor General’s website, DePasquale’s audits identified nearly $600 million in misspent or potentially recoverable state money during his first term.

A Pittsburgh native, DePasquale is the grandson of the late Eugene “Jeep” DePasquale, a longtime president of Pittsburgh City Council.

He was a high school athlete who helped lead the Central Catholic football team to a PIAA State championship in 1988.

One other Democrat so far, Tom Brier, has announced his candidacy for the nomination to challenge Perry.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.