ShareThis Page
Jury begins deliberating in case of 2016 Thanksgiving crash that killed family |

Jury begins deliberating in case of 2016 Thanksgiving crash that killed family

Megan Guza
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Accident reconstruction experts investigate the scene of a crash that killed a couple and their toddler daughter on Thanksgiving Day in 2016.
Allegheny County Jail
Demetrius Coleman is charged in the 2016 Thanksgiving Day crash that killed a couple and their toddler daughter. Coleman allegedly fled a traffic stop and topped 100 mph in the moments before the crash.

Jurors must decide whether the man charged with causing the 2016 Thanksgiving crash that killed a family of three truly intended to cause harm that day or if the crash was the unintended consequence of reckless actions.

The jury began deliberating Wednesday, weighing not whether 24-year-old Demetrius Coleman is guilty of causing the fatal crash, but whether is he guilty of third-degree murder or involuntary manslaughter.

Coleman was 22 on Nov. 24, 2016, when he ran from a traffic stop near the GetGo on Route 30 in North Versailles. He drove on Route 30 at speeds reaching 100 mph before he slammed into Kaylie Meininger’s Ford Taurus, killing Meininger, her 2-year-old daughter, Annika, and her fiancé, David Bianco.

The car burst into flames, creating a fireball so severe that it was not immediately clear to first responders how many people were in the car.

Coleman’s attorney, Brent McCune, ran through the slew of charges against his client: homicide by vehicle, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and others. He told the jury that Coleman was guilty of killing the family as they drove to their Thanksgiving dinner that day but that his client didn’t mean to. McCune asked the jury to convict Coleman of the lesser charge of involuntary manslaughter.

Coleman testified in his own defense, saying that he never meant to kill anyone. He said he doesn’t remember throttling down Route 30 or the fireball crash that ended the pursuit.

He admitted he’d been selling drugs that day and he’d gotten high on marijuana earlier. When East McKeesport officer Scott Lowden pulled him over for an illegal left turn, he became scared as time passed and more cars arrived. Coleman had no license and was wanted on two bench warrants. His passenger had heroin on her.

“I was scared,” he testified. “I didn’t want to put myself in more trouble.”

He said he didn’t remember how many police cars showed up to the traffic stop, “but I figured I was probably going to go to jail on Thanksgiving.”

Assistant District Attorney Douglas Maloney questioned whether Coleman knew there were warrants out for him. Coleman said he figured there were, but he wasn’t certain. Maloney also asked why Coleman didn’t admit to detectives there was heroin in the car. Coleman said that it wasn’t actually in his possession at the time.

“My job is not to help the detectives,” said Coleman, who remained reserved during his questioning. “I only help myself.”

Maloney asked if he thought lying to detectives that day would help him. Coleman said yes.

Maloney seized on the number of bad decisions Coleman made leading up to the fatal crash, including selling drugs, getting high, fleeing police, pulling into traffic without stopping or braking and continuing down Route 30 at high speeds.

He pointed out that Coleman almost struck another car head-on then nearly plowed in to an oncoming police cruiser. Rather than stopping when he ran red lights or nearly killed two others, Coleman kept driving, Maloney said.

He argued that Coleman knew he was going to kill someone if he kept driving like that, and he kept driving anyway.

“He was fully aware of the risk of his driving,” he said.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.