Financial website claims Penn Hills best place in Pittsburgh area to retire | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Financial website claims Penn Hills best place in Pittsburgh area to retire

Michael DiVittorio
1425217_web1_municipal-complex

Penn Hills is one of Pennsylvania’s best places to live retired, according to GOBankingRates.com.

The website is designed to be a personal finance resource to share articles and advice on managing money.

They made their retirement determination based on median home list price, annual mortgage total and annual cost of living expenses.

The site says Penn Hills has the fourth-largest population in the state of people ages 65 and older.

The city also has the seventh-lowest median list price for a home at $90,000 and the seventh-lowest mortgage at just over $4,000. In addition, Penn Hills has the ninth-lowest annual cost of living, plus has annual mortgage payment of about $22,500 a year.

Resident Linda Boutillette seems to agree with the site’s assessment, and wants people to look beyond the numbers.

“Penn Hills has its problems like every other community, but overall it is a great place to live,” she said. “Some of the things I enjoy about living here are a variety of stores to shop at within a short drive, many churches of different denominations, a variety of after school activities for children, close proximity to downtown, Monroeville (and) Boyce Park.

“We have several beautiful playgrounds for the children, and for the most part the people are proud of their community.

“On the downside, of course, is the problem with the enormous debt from the school district, taxes, and the high sewage and water bills. I do believe that just like anything else in life, you get back what you put into it.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.