Fired then reinstated, Pittsburgh cop sues city, Peduto |

Fired then reinstated, Pittsburgh cop sues city, Peduto

Bob Bauder
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh attorney Joel Sansone briefs reporters at his office on May 9, 2019, on a federal lawsuit he filed against the city of Pittsburgh on behalf of former city police offier Robert Kramer (L).

A Pittsburgh police officer fired last year in connection with an alleged road rage incident sued the city on Thursday, claiming malicious prosecution, fabrication of evidence and racial discrimination.

Robert Kramer was charged in 2017 with pointing a gun at another motorist while off duty. An Allegheny County jury last year acquitted him of a charge of simple assault. An arbitration panel in March ordered the city to reinstate Kramer with retroactive pay.

The city is appealing the arbitration ruling.

Kramer said he could never bring himself to return to work.

“I was falsely accused of crimes by members of my own department who knew that I was innocent,” Kramer said, reading a statement at the office of his Downtown attorney, Joel Sansone. “A jury of my peers declared me innocent. An arbitrator found that I was fired unfairly, and yet my career as a police officer is over because I can’t function safely after all that has been said and done.”

Pittsburgh Public Safety spokesman Chris Togneri declined comment, citing the pending litigation.

The lawsuit contends that Kramer’s firing was based on allegations from a known criminal who expressed hatred toward police in a social media posting and the lies of a detective, Ed Green, who investigated the matter. Kramer was also accused of lying when questioned about a gun he owned and allegedly displayed during the incident in question.

In addition to the federal lawsuit, Kramer filed discrimination complaints against the city with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission and the U.S. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. He contends that police Chief Scott Schubert fired him for allegedly lying, but took no action against Green. Kramer denied that he lied about the gun.

“Mr. Green was found by the department to have told untruths,” Sansone said. “He lied under oath. The only difference between Mr. Green, who was not fired, and Bob Kramer, who was, is that Bob Kramer is white and Edward Green is black.”

The 22-page lawsuit names Schubert, Mayor Bill Peduto, Green, retired police Cmdr. Shirley Epperson and unnamed upper management within the Pittsburgh Police Bureau as defendants.

The suit accuses Peduto of slandering Kramer in previous public comments he made about the case.

Peduto declined comment, citing the pending litigation.

“Obviously he’s using the comments I made to the press as his case, so I’m going to have to wait until after this has been able to go through a fair trial before I’m going to be able to comment on anything involving Mr. Kramer,” Peduto said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.