2 firefighters injured in 5-alarm West Oakland apartment fire | TribLIVE.com

2 firefighters injured in 5-alarm West Oakland apartment fire

Pittsburgh firefighters were fighting a four-alarm blaze Saturday in an apartment complex in the city’s Uptown neighborhood.

Two Pittsburgh firefighters were injured while fighting a five-alarm blaze Saturday afternoon in an apartment complex in the city’s West Oakland neighborhood, according to the city Department of Public Safety.

The fire on De Ruad Street started just after 2 p.m. as a two-alarm blaze, but it went to a five-alarm within an hour, according to Allegheny County 911.

Pittsburgh firefighters declared the blaze under control as of 5:35 p.m.

However, as of 6 p.m., Fifth Avenue remained closed between Birmingham Bridge and Jumonville Street. Officials were at the scene to inspect the integrity of the building.

A Public Safety spokeswoman said the firefighters were in stable condition when taken to a hospital. One was being treated for smoke inhalation. The other had unknown injuries.

Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire Chief Darryl Jones described the situation as “a very stubborn fire in a very large and old building.”

Officials said there were 48 apartments in the building, with 74 residents. All of them were safely accounted for; it’s unclear if any required medical treatment or hospitalization.

The Red Cross and the Salvation Army both provided assistance to residents on scene.

Also, Red Cross will be helping to direct residents toward temporary shelter and providing help with food and belongings such as clothing and blankets. Port Authority also provided a bus for transportation.

The cause of the fire is still under investigation by Pittsburgh fire and police.

WPXI-TV said people from 74 apartments were impacted.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.