ShareThis Page
Peregrine falcons at Pitt’s Cathedral of Learning have 1st egg of season | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Peregrine falcons at Pitt’s Cathedral of Learning have 1st egg of season

Mary Ann Thomas
| Tuesday, March 12, 2019 1:30 a.m
869290_web1_PeregrineEgg
Courtresy of the National Aviary
The first egg of the season has been laid by Hope, the peregrine falcon atop the Cathedral of Learning in Oakland. In the photo is her mate, Terzo, on March 11, 2019.

The peregrine falcons nesting atop the University of Pittsburgh’s Cathedral of Leaning have their first egg of the season.

Hope and Terzo last year raised two healthy chicks banded by the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Monitors spotted their first egg of the season Monday afternoon while watching a live web cam made possible by the National Aviary. Details were reported by Kate St. John in her blog “Outside My Window.”

Other area falcons are getting active as well.

Along the Allegheny River, the Tarentum falcons were active inside their nest box under the Tarentum Bridge on Monday. Photographer Dave Brooke photographed the birds at their box. There is no web cam there. At the Westinghouse Bridge in Pittsburgh, Dana Nesiti photographed that pair mating, according to the Facebook group Falconuts.

Other pairs are nesting in the region, with nesting reports forthcoming.

Since the birds are threatened, St. John and the game commission will track their breeding progress through the spring.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, mthomas@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.