Former Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to 2017 federal heroin charge from Lincoln-Lemington | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Former Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to 2017 federal heroin charge from Lincoln-Lemington

Jeff Himler
1662434_web1_web-heroin

A former Pittsburgh man has pleaded guilty to a federal heroin charge stemming from a 2017 arrest at the site of an alleged fentanyl lab in the city’s Lincoln-Lemington section.

Dezmen Hicks, 33, formerly of Inwood Street, pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute heroin Tuesday in front of Chief U.S. District Court Judge Mark R. Hornak in Pittsburgh.

Hicks, who has been detained since his initial appearance in federal court on July 20, 2017, faces sentencing Jan. 20.

According to information provided to the court, Hicks fled into a nearby house when Pittsburgh police attempted to approach him in connection with a 911 call on July 19, 2017, in the 6000 block of Auburn Street. Following him into the house, officers saw Hicks attempting to hide a blue bag in the freezer section of a refrigerator.

The bag was recovered and found to contain about 25 “bricks,” or 1,250 packets, of heroin, according to court documents.

During a search of the home, city police and federal Drug Enforcement Agency Special Agents and task force officers found a large-scale fentanyl production lab in the basement and various narcotics, numerous firearms, currency and drug packaging and branding material throughout the house, the documents state.

Hicks faces a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $2 million fine.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy M. Lanni is prosecuting the case.

Federal charges are pending against two co-defendants who fled from the basement of the home, according to police.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.