Former Pittsburgh regatta promoter charged with DUI |

Former Pittsburgh regatta promoter charged with DUI

Bob Bauder
Three Rivers Regatta promoter Derek Weber

A Ross man blamed for the cancellation of this year’s Pittsburgh Three Rivers Regatta is facing charges of public lewdness and drunken driving, according to a criminal complaint.

Ross police charged Derek Weber, 44, after receiving a report of a man urinating outside of a vehicle at a parking lot in the 4000 block of McKnight Road. Weber’s blood-alcohol level was 0.31%, nearly four times the legal limit of 0.08%, according to the complaint.

Weber is president of LionHeart Event Group, which promoted the Pittsburgh regatta for years. Regatta officials canceled the weekend event on July 30, three days before it was scheduled to start, saying Weber misled them about payments to vendors, and insurance, among other things. LionHeart has since filed for bankruptcy.

Weber could not be reached for comment.

“I can confirm it is him, but I will have no comment until I have an opportunity to view the criminal complaint, which I have not done,” said Weber’s attorney, Albert P. Veverka.

According to the complaint, police found Weber on Oct. 2 sitting in a running vehicle at a shopping plaza along McKnight Road with an empty liquor bottle under his seat. A woman, who called police, reported she witnessed Weber urinating in the lot.

Weber failed three sobriety tests before being arrested, according to police. Ross police officer Jason Gilotty filed charges on Tuesday.

Pittsburgh police in July launched a criminal investigation into LionHeart following the regatta cancellation. The company owes regatta sponsors and service providers — including city police and the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office — nearly $750,000, according to bankruptcy documents.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.