Former Port Vue man gets 15-year prison term for role in 2015 heroin shipments | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Former Port Vue man gets 15-year prison term for role in 2015 heroin shipments

Jeff Himler
1662629_web1_Handcuffs5

A former Port Vue man has been sentenced to 15 years in federal prison for his role in orchestrating shipments of heroin from New Jersey to Allegheny County in 2015.

In the sentencing announced Wednesday in Pittsburgh, U.S. District Court Judge Cathy Bissoon also ordered Jarran Bell, 38, to complete 10 years of supervised release following his term behind bars. He pleaded guilty to three counts of possession and conspiring to distribute heroin.

In April 2015, Bell and his girlfriend, Krystle Barretto, orchestrated two large shipments of heroin from Patterson, N.J., to the area of McKeesport and Port Vue, according to court documents. That included transport of about 500 “bricks” of heroin on April 19 of that year by courier Amanda Santiago, using a taxi cab, prosecutors said.

The following day, agents seized the heroin and also searched Bell and Barretto’s bedroom, seizing a loaded firearm, about five additional bricks of heroin and a money counter.

Santiago pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 2½ years in prison.

Barretto, who pleaded guilty, was sentenced to six years in prison followed by four years of supervised release.

The guilty pleas resulted from a federal wiretap investigation that intercepted at least 10 cell phones from December 2014 to April 2015.

The investigation “established the existence of a number of overlapping and interrelated drug distribution networks” at work in Clairton, McKeesport and Port Vue as well as areas of Washington and Westmoreland counties, according to U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.