Former sheriff’s clerk sentenced for helping targets of drug investigation | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Former sheriff’s clerk sentenced for helping targets of drug investigation

Dillon Carr
899851_web1_GavelNewN

A former Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office clerk was sentenced in federal court Monday for helping two people being investigated for their alleged involvement in a drug trafficking operation.

Erika Romanowski, 41, of Pittsburgh, will serve one day in prison, six months of home detention, three years of supervised release and 100 hours of community service.

A Justice Department news release said Romanowski shared sensitive law enforcement information with Jewell Hall and Joelle Hollis “in an effort to protect Hall from investigation and prosecution by federal authorities.”

Romanowski was charged with obstruction of justice and making false statements in July. She pleaded guilty in November.

The Justice Department news release said Hall and Hollis were targets of a federal grand jury investigation focused on an alleged drug trafficking organization known as the Greenway Boy Killas that operated in the West End neighborhood of Pittsburgh.

Hall and Hollis and 14 other people were charged in June for various drug offenses, according to the release. That case is pending.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.