Glassport man pleads guilty to shooting pit bulls | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Glassport man pleads guilty to shooting pit bulls

Megan Guza
1264161_web1_GavelNewN

A Glassport man pleaded guilty Friday to taking his two pit bulls to the borough dump last year and shooting them, leaving one dead and one wounded.

Quincy Cowans pleaded guilty to multiple counts of cruelty to animals. Common Pleas Judge David Cashman sentenced him to five years of probation. Cowans, 28, also is forbidden from owning any animals for a decade.

Glassport police became aware of the abuse when animal control officers responded to a call about an injured pit bull near Minnesota Avenue on Dec. 28, according to the criminal complaint. Police later determined the dog had been shot.

Police posted photos of the dog to Facebook in an attempt to find the owner, which they said led them to Cowans.

His wife first tried to say the dogs ran away but Cowans admitted to taking his two dogs to the Glassport dump and shooting them with his 9mm pistol, according to the complaint. He said he shot at the dogs so they wouldn’t follow him home.

Police searched for the second dog, which they found several hours later, buried and under a pile of brush, according to the complaint. Investigators said the dog had been shot in the head and neck.

The surviving pit bull lost an eye to its injuries.

Cowans also must pay $2,000 in restitution, part of which will cover medical treatment for the surviving dog.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.