Greenway Boy Killas member pleads to conspiracy to distribute crack | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Greenway Boy Killas member pleads to conspiracy to distribute crack

Chuck Biedka
932739_web1_web-crackcocaine

An alleged Pittsburgh street gang member pleaded guilty Monday in federal court in Pittsburgh to one count of conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine.

Brett Rodgers, 32, of Pittsburgh, entered the plea before Senior U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab.

Prosecutors told the court that, in 2017, FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration agents started to wiretap the Greenway Boy Killas, also known as GBK, street gang in Pittsburgh’s West End.

The wiretap revealed that, from November 2017 through June 2018, Rodgers conspired to distribute 28 grams — about 10 ounces — or more of crack cocaine.

Schwab scheduled sentencing for July 9.

He initially pleaded not guilty to three charges but, in plea deal, changed his plea to guilty of one charge only.

The court ordered that Rodgers be kept in jail until sentencing.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Tonya Sulia Goodman and Rachael Dizard are prosecuting this case.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.