Gov. Wolf removes, replaces Port Authority board member | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Gov. Wolf removes, replaces Port Authority board member

Jamie Martines
1008743_web1_WEB-port-authority-bus

Gov. Tom Wolf removed and replaced a member of the Allegheny County Port Authority Board Thursday following calls from regional transit advocacy groups.

In an open letter sent Thursday to Wolf and Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, Pittsburghers for Public Transit, along with a dozen other organizations and elected officials, urged Wolf to consider replacing Robert Kania on the 11-member board.

Kania’s four-year term expired in 2017. He was appointed to the 11-member board by former Gov. Tom Corbett in 2013.

The groups also pointed out in the letter that a complaint has been filed against Kania for an alleged violation of state campaign finance law by the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Campaign for Accountability.

Hours later, Spokesperson J.J. Abbott said in a statement that Wolf had removed Kania from the board and replaced him with an interim appointee, Jessica Walls-Lavelle, the governor’s Southwestern Regional Director.

“We have been engaging stakeholders and legislators regarding potential appointees and that process continues in hopes of finding consensus,” the statement said.

It went on to express confidence that Walls-Lavelle “will be a strong advocate for building and maintaining the transit network in Allegheny County.”

Kania, president of the Pittsburgh-based internet technology consulting firm Direct Technology solutions, could not be reached for comment Thursday.

The April 8 complaint lodged with the Allegheny County Board of Elections and the Allegheny County District Attorney’s office alleges that Kania failed to disclose political activity and report campaign finances in 2018.

“Mr. Kania should be held accountable for any campaign finance violations, and Gov. Wolf should seriously consider whether someone who behaved in this way is fit to serve as a public official in Allegheny County,” Alice Huling, counsel at the Council for the Campaign for Accountability said in a statement.

The complaint cites reporting by WESA and alleges that Kania was involved in running a political committee called Americans Against Socialism since the fall of 2018. The committee was established to oppose the election of state Rep. Sara Innamorato, who was backed by the local chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, according to the report. Officials with the Pennsylvania Department of State told WESA that such committees would be required to follow state laws for registering the committee and filing financial disclosure forms.

“While we appreciate that Governor Wolf has heeded transit riders’ call in removing Kania from the board, we have yet to hear from his office,” Laura Wiens, executive director of Pittsburghers for Public Transit said in a statement Thursday. “Transit riders and transit workers are key stakeholders in this vital public asset and must have a say in the appointment process.”

The organizations are encouraging the public to write to Wolf to request that he appoint Heather McClain to replace Kania on the Port Authority board. She currently serves as the community initiatives manager for Healthy Ride bike share.

At least 70 people have participated in the letter-writing campaign as of Thursday evening, Wiens said.

“In her role as the community initiatives manager for Healthy Ride, Heather McClain has been a tireless advocate for increasing mobility and access, particularly for marginalized communities,” Laura Wiens, executive director of Pittsburghers for Public Transit, said in a statement. “She is a long-time, regular transit rider, and is a leader in advancing equitable, inclusive growth in the Beechview community.”

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.