Fort Pitt Bridge celebrates 60 years as part of Pittsburgh’s grand entrance |

Fort Pitt Bridge celebrates 60 years as part of Pittsburgh’s grand entrance

Paul Guggenheimer
Tribune-Review file
The sun rises over the Fort Pitt Bridge.
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The Fort Pitt Bridge spans the Monongahela River in Pittsburgh on Friday, June 7, 2013.
Tribune-Review file
The sun rises over the Fort Pitt Bridge.
Tribune-Review file
The Fort Pitt Bridge is connected with traffic across Point State Park, Monday, June 22, 2015.

In a place that has more bridges than any other city in the world, it’s hard to pick one that stands out from the other 445.

The ornate Smithfield Street Bridge, built in 1881, is the oldest through-truss bridge in the United States.

The Sixth Street Bridge, now called the Roberto Clemente Bridge, received an award in 1929 from the American Institute of Steel Construction for its self-anchored suspension design.

And there is the Fort Duquesne Bridge, also known as the “Bridge to Nowhere,” because of lengthy construction delays.

But perhaps no bridge in Pittsburgh evokes more visceral feelings from residents and visitors alike than the Fort Pitt Bridge.

Wednesday marked 60 years since the Fort Pitt Bridge opened as the world’s first computer-designed bowstring arch bridge and the first double-decker bowstring arch bridge. But all that takes a back seat to the dramatic view that the bridge affords to those who cross it.

Tribune-Review file
The Fort Pitt Bridge is seen from West Carson Street.

The Fort Pitt Bridge famously inspired the New York Times to call Pittsburgh “the only city in America with an entrance” and say that it’s “the best way to enter an American city.” If you have ever driven through the Fort Pitt Tunnel and onto the bridge, you know exactly what the Times was talking about.

“The City of Pittsburgh gleaming suddenly before her … so startling in its vastness and its beauty that she had gasped and slowed, afraid of losing control of the car,” writer Kim Edwards said.

Mario Lemieux knew nothing about the city when he first showed up in 1984 but, once he came through the tunnel and onto the Fort Pitt Bridge, he knew he liked it.

Returning from a long road trip, Willie Stargell once said, “Last night, coming in from the airport, we came through the tunnel and the city opened up its arms and I felt at home.”

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian David McCullough said, “Pittsburgh is the only city that makes an entrance.”

The Fort Pitt Bridge opened at 11 a.m. June 19, 1959, with a ribbon-cutting ceremony presided over by then-Gov. David L. Lawrence. A water cannon was fired some 100 yards from the bridge to celebrate its completion. The bridge, which spans just more than 1,200 feet, cost $6,305,000 to build.

“It was an engineering marvel,” said Heinz History Center President and CEO Andy Masich. “With the advent of automobile culture after World War II, everyone was driving. The bridges and tunnels and the streets of Pittsburgh were just jam packed and traffic was awful. They really needed that new bridge and tunnel to get cars off the city streets and on to the interstate highways. The Fort Pitt Bridge and Tunnel relieved all that pressure.”

“Whether or not its designers — the region’s own American Bridge — knew just how significant the structure would be, we can’t know,” said Allegheny Conference on Community Development CEO Stefani Pashman.

The bridge has played a prominent role in popular culture.

Among its recent appearances is in the iconic scene from “The Perks of Being a Wallflower,” when Emma Watson stands in the back of a pickup truck with her arms raised as her friends drive through the tunnel and she emerges triumphantly on the bridge, silhouetted against the sprawling city skyline.

But the scene certainly wasn’t filmed at rush hour.

Unfortunately, the Fort Pitt Bridge is one of the more scenic choke points of the city. With some 150,000 cars crossing it on a daily basis, traffic is constantly backed up on the bridge, which has earned a reputation for difficult lane changes, particularly on the lower level, which often require motorists to go from the extreme left lane across two lanes to the extreme right lane in only 300 feet.

“I think it’s a love/hate relationship,” Masich said. “Yeah, the locals at commuter hours dread the pinch point that is the Fort Pitt Tunnel. Any tunnels slow down traffic. But, at the same time, it’s one of the things we’re proudest of when you hear newcomers come to Pittsburgh. When you come home from the airport and come through that tunnel and the city opens up before you as you pop out of the tunnel and you see the fountain and the skyline and the three rivers converging at the Point. Boy, there’s nothing that makes you more proud.”

Tribune-Review file
Cars are gridlocked on the Fort Pitt Bridge.

Pashman says the Fort Pitt Bridge certainly helped to define the transformation of the region over nearly two generations.

“The bridge is a defining element in the way Pittsburgh presents itself to the world, conveying beyond traffic and commerce, a sense of excitement that one has arrived in a place with a promising future,” Pashman said.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.