ShareThis Page
Health aid accused of assaulting 92-year-old Pittsburgh woman |

Health aid accused of assaulting 92-year-old Pittsburgh woman

Megan Guza
| Wednesday, January 30, 2019 2:14 p.m

A home health care aid allegedly assaulted a 92-year-old woman, kicking her so hard that she required stitches, police said.

Brightstar Healthcare aid Kweilin Wofford told city police she was headed to the apartment of Bunny Pittsburgh in the Riverview Towers in Squirrel Hill when she heard screaming and swearing, according to a criminal complaint.

The incident happened Jan. 23 as Wofford arrived to take care of Pittsburgh, her client.

She realized the commotion was coming from Pittsburgh’s apartment, according to the complaint, and she allegedly heard Pittsburgh say, “You kicked me, why would you kick me?”

She said she opened the door to find another Brightstar caregiver, Joann Cargile, standing over Pittsburgh, who was sitting on her bed, police wrote.

Wofford told police that Pittsburgh was screaming that Cargile, 72, kicked her, according to the complaint. Cargile said Pittsburgh was lying and must have bumped her leg.

“Bunny is saying that I kicked her, and I didn’t,” Cargile allegedly said.

“She kicked me with her boot,” Pittsburgh said, pointing to Cargile’s boot, according to the complaint.

Paramedics arrived and gave Pittsburgh 17 stitches. Police indicated that Pittsburgh has severe dementia.

Cargile of Wilkinsburg is charged with aggravated assault and neglect of a care-dependent person, court records show. No attorney information was listed for Cargile on Wednesday afternoon.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.