Heroin dealer with ties to Pittsburgh, Penn Hills, McKees Rocks gets 7 1/2 years in prison | TribLIVE.com

Heroin dealer with ties to Pittsburgh, Penn Hills, McKees Rocks gets 7 1/2 years in prison

Natasha Lindstrom

A former Pittsburgh resident who pleaded guilty to dealing heroin will spend 7 1/2 years behind bars for drug and firearms violations, federal prosecutors said Thursday.

Maurice Dewayne Tinsley Jr., 38, who has ties to Penn Hills, McKees Rocks and Pittsburgh’s North Side, was convicted of plotting to sell heroin and possessing a gun for use in drug trafficking, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

The charges stemmed from a search warrant served at Tinsley’s residence in July 2016 that turned up 40 to 60 grams of heroin and stamp bags, the packets used to sell heroin, along with multiple guns, ammunition, cell phones and $14,400 in cash, prosecutors said.

Tinsley must forfeit all of the cash seized by the Drug Enforcement Administration as part of his sentence, Brady said.

He was prohibited from owning a gun as a felon.

Tinsley’s prior crimes include a 2012 conviction for heroin trafficking and a 2010 charge for illegally possessing a firearm.

During the sentencing hearing at the federal courthouse in Downtown Pittsburgh, U.S. District Judge Mark R. Hornak told Tinsley that guns and drugs have a “toxic” and “deadly” effect on society, according to Brady.

Tinsley had faced a maximum possible sentence of up to life in prison and a $4.5 million fine.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ross E. Lenhardt and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Chad R. Parks of the Beaver County District Attorney’s Office prosecuted the case.

The DEA led the investigation with help from state police and police from Pittsburgh, Penn Hills, Canonsburg, Donora, Robinson and Coraopolis.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.