Highmark gives $35 million to Carnegie Mellon University wellness center | TribLIVE.com

Highmark gives $35 million to Carnegie Mellon University wellness center

Paul Guggenheimer
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Carnegie Mellon University President Farnam Jahanian.

Carnegie Mellon University announced Thursday that it will build a new student health, wellness and athletics center on its Oakland campus, thanks to a $35 million grant from Highmark Inc.

The 160,000-square-foot building will, for the first time, unite student well-being services under one roof, according to a Highmark press release.

The project, located at the corner of Tech and Margaret Morrison streets, aims to preserve and improve the existing Skibo Gymnasium for recreational use and construct a modern addition on the surrounding site.

As planned, the expansion will include space for university health services, counseling and psychological services and CMU’s intercollegiate athletics program, as well as recreational sports.

The building will face Schenley Park and is being billed as a “gateway to campus.”

“This new centralized facility will improve access to health services, counseling, wellness and athletics activities, with the goal of supporting students in building habits that will be the foundation for their future health, lives, and careers,” said Highmark Health president and CEO David Holmberg.

CMU president Farnam Jahanian said students’ mental and physical health is critical to ensuring their lifelong success, both personally and professionally.

“We are delighted to extend our partnership with Highmark Health to bring to fruition our vision for a unified, comprehensive facility that supports many facets of students’ well-being,” said Jahanian.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.