Homewood mother charged after 3-year-old found nearly naked outside | TribLIVE.com

Homewood mother charged after 3-year-old found nearly naked outside

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Stevatezia Terrelle Cha Mickel

Pittsburgh police allegedly found three children living in filthy conditions in a Homewood rowhouse after one of them was seen standing outside nearly naked in near-freezing conditions.

Police charged Stevatezia Terrelle Cha Mickel, 23, with two felony counts of endangering the welfare of children on March 18, according to court records. She is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on Wednesday.

Mickel has three children, ages 1, 3 and 6, the Trib’s news partner, WPXI-TV, reported.

A woman driving by called 911 after seeing the 3-year-old girl standing on the sidewalk in front of Mickel’s rowhouse on Hamilton Avenue with only a towel covering her. It was around 9 a.m. and the temperature was 35 degrees.

The woman walked the girl inside, where she saw a baby alone on a couch. The baby had a soiled diaper that had not been changed in hours, WPXI reported police as saying.

Police said they found filthy conditions when they searched the home, including “feces, dirt and filth on almost everything,” the station reported. There was little food in the home.

WPXI reported that Mickel told police that she was in the bathroom when the 3-year-old, who knows how to open doors, went outside.

The children were placed in protective custody, according to WPXI.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.