How a movie about Mister Rogers came together | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

How a movie about Mister Rogers came together

Paul Guggenheimer
1971499_web1_ptr-DayMovie-112319
Sony Pictures Entertainment
Director Marielle Heller and Tom Hanks on the set of “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood.”
1971499_web1_Ptr-rogersredcarpet03-112119
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Joanne Rogers (right) and Marielle Heller, director of “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood,” at the film’s Pittsburgh premiere at the SouthSide Works Cinema on Nov. 20.

Marielle Heller had a daunting task.

As the director of “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood,” she had the job of bringing a story to the big screen that involved two legendary performers: children’s TV host Fred Rogers and the multi-Oscar-winning actor playing him, Tom Hanks.

Her mission became a matter of balancing two very different personalities.

Once she worked through that challenge, she said she wanted to bring the story to life in the most truthful way. The story in this case focuses on Lloyd Vogel, a cynical investigative journalist played by Matthew Rhys who, in the process of profiling Fred Rogers, ends up getting a lot more than just a story.

“Daunting is one way to put it,” Heller said. “We viewed it as a responsibility. We all feel an ownership of Mister Rogers. Everyone feels like he’s theirs.

“More people than I can even count said to me, ‘You know, when I was growing up I actually thought Mister Rogers was my dad.’ If I got caught up on the fact that there was so much pressure to do this right, it would have been really hard to tell this movie in a truthful way. So, all I could do was to focus on the task at hand, which was to get the essence of this person right.”

That meant getting the performance she needed out of Hanks, which involved getting the actor to slow down to a very deliberate Mister Rogers pace. The process wasn’t easy.

“With Tom Hanks, he’s a very boisterous, loud, funny guy,” Heller said. “He’s got a lot of energy and so a lot of it was physically trying to slow him down, saying, ‘I want you to find stillness.’ But more of it was about really listening and the space between him and Matthew and how they were listening to each other.”

The Vogel character is based on real-life journalist Tom Junod, who wrote an Esquire magazine cover story on Rogers in 1998. Junod’s conversations with Rogers ended up having a profound effect on his life.

“They both have a plan to save the world,” Heller said. “One of them inherently believes people are good. One inherently believes that people are bad and that [his] job is to expose that truth somewhere.”

Rogers is the unmistakable good guy of this movie. But a friendly gentleman in a red cardigan is about as unlikely a big-screen hero as one would find in a 21st-century film.

“I realized early on that someone like Fred couldn’t be the protagonist of a movie because he was already too far in his evolution,” Heller said. “But he makes a really good antagonist.

“We met so many people who felt like they had this similar story where meeting Fred changed their life. He had an ability to really bring major change out of people who he came into contact with, really change their lives. So, it was about trying to get that right.”

A dramatic change in anyone’s life brings with it a certain amount of emotional upheaval. There are scenes that called for Rhys to summon that emotion to the surface. With Heller’s help, he managed to do so in a convincing way.

“For me, because I’m an actor, I have a certain language that I use to talk to actors, which is about backstory, about what brought you here,” Heller said. “What are you thinking about? Where are you emotionally? What does that feel like in your body? You don’t say, ‘I want you to cry here.’ In general, you try to say, ‘Let’s talk about how Fred has affected you in this moment.’ ”

For Junod, the fact that his story about befriending Fred Rogers ended up being the basis for a movie has left him gobsmacked.

“It’s 20 years later [but] all of a sudden the time became right for it,” Junod said. “So, this movie seems not just contemporary. Its relevance is one of the most powerful things about it.”

If there’s an ultimate seal of approval, it would have to come from Fred Rogers’ widow, Joanne. She said the movie amazed her.

“I knew it was going to be very special because [Heller] was going to make it that way,” she said. “And how could you not love Tom. I just thought he just disappeared into the character. You didn’t even think that it wasn’t Fred.”

Of course, it didn’t hurt that she took Mister Rogers’ ties from his closet and loaned them to Hanks. But since the actor was reportedly discovered to be distantly related to Fred, one might surmise it was all in the family.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.