Incumbent Paul Zavarella of Plum gets Democratic Party nod for November ballot |

Incumbent Paul Zavarella of Plum gets Democratic Party nod for November ballot

Michael DiVittorio

Incumbent Paul D. Zavarella of Plum received the Allegheny County Democratic Committee’s nod to be on the November ballot for the District 8 county council seat.

About 102 out of the district’s near 150 Democratic Party committee members voted in a special election Saturday.

Committee Chairwoman Eileen Kelly said Zavarella earned the majority with 48 votes.

Challengers Bhavini Patel and Ryan O’Donnell received 31 and 23 votes, respectively.

“Everything went smoothly,” Kelly said. “… They were all great candidates, they all worked hard. It was up to the committee. Sometimes the incumbent does have the edge because he gets to show what he can do. The committee watches that.”

The meeting was necessary for one of the reasons Zavarella is on county council now — the passing of longtime politician and college administrator Charles Martoni.

Martoni, a Swissvale Democrat, who served nearly 20 years as an Allegheny County councilman representing Pittsburgh’s eastern suburbs and parts of the Mon Valley.

He last won reelection in 2017. He was 82.

Zavarella was appointed by Allegheny County Council to fill the vacancy in June.

The primary election was May 21. Zavarella will have to win in November if he wants to keep his seat beyond the end of the year.

Zavarella is a lifelong Plum resident. He is an attorney who practices criminal defense law and municipal law as well as wills and estates with Bruce Dice & Associates.

District 8 spans 17 municipalities, including Plum, Monroeville, Wilkinsburg, and much of the Mon Valley, from Rankin and East McKeesport to Trafford and Pitcairn.

It’s unclear of Zavarella will have a Republican challenger.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.