Investigators unsure if Pittsburgh school director’s name was forged on Amazon letter | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Investigators unsure if Pittsburgh school director’s name was forged on Amazon letter

Bob Bauder
790032_web1_KevinCarterB
Pittsburgh Public Schools board member Kevin Carter

A handwriting expert was unable to determine whether a Pittsburgh school board member signed a letter last year in support of the region’s bid for Amazon’s second headquarters, according to a report released Friday.

Director Kevin Carter said he felt justified by the findings.

“I’m sad that we spent so much and it came back inconclusive, but I do feel justified with the investigator’s strong statement that it was not me who signed that letter,” Carter said.

The school board retained Beaver County-based Corporate Security and Investigations Inc. after Carter alleged that someone forged his name on the Oct. 11 letter containing his signature and that of school Superintendent Anthony Hamlet. The district paid the company $4,192 for the investigation, according to district spokeswoman Ebony Pugh.

Handwriting expert Khody R. Detwiler found there was a “strong probability” that Carter did not sign the letter, but could not conclusively determine it was a forgery because Carter and his attorney did not respond to questions pertaining to Carter’s physical condition in October, according to a 124-page report produced by CSI.

“Although the questioned ‘Kevin Carter’ signature contains many significant dissimilarities when compared against the submitted known signatures of Kevin Carter received for analysis it is not possible with the available evidence to verify Mr. Carter’s complete range of (handwriting) variation during the time period at issue,” Detwiler wrote in the report.

The letter pledged potential tax breaks and other incentives to Amazon. It was sent to the company along with the region’s nearly $10 billion bid — titled “Future Forged For All” — for Amazon’s second headquarters. Amazon, which promised 50,000 jobs and $5 billion in investment with its HQ2, opted to locate in New York and Arlington, Virginia.

Carter said he was never briefed on the Amazon bid, or anything contained in the letter and didn’t know the letter existed until officials released the bid in November.

The school board is now taking steps to prevent a similar situation in the future.

Board President Lynda Wrenn said members would implement Solicitor Ira Weiss’ recommendations that any future letters of support be voted on by the board during a public meeting, and signed only by the board president if approved.

“It’s too bad it was inconclusive,” Wrenn said of the report. “I think for the benefit for Mr. Carter it was worth it. I think if it was me I would want it addressed.”

Weiss noted a significant controversy at the time surrounding Carter’s claim and said the only way to resolve it was through an independent investigation conducted by an outside agency.

“It was approached it in a way to address the allegations raised by Mr. Carter,” Weiss said. “The result was there is no conclusive evidence, one way or another, as to whether it was someone other than Mr. Carter.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.