Judge issues gag order in case of accused cop-killer Christian Bey | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Judge issues gag order in case of accused cop-killer Christian Bey

Tom Davidson
1692094_web1_PTR-ChristianBey
Christian Bey, 30.
1692094_web1_GTR-Bey-072319
Christian Bey in July, after being charged with homicide in the shooting death of officer Calvin Hall.

An Allegheny County Judge issued a gag order Wednesday in the capital murder case of a man charged in conneciton with the killing a Pittsburgh police officer.

Christian Bey, 30, of Wilkinsburg, is accused of killing Pittsburgh police Officer Calvin Hall in July. Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. will seek the death penalty if Bey is convicted, he said.

On Wednesday, Allegheny County Judge Kevin G. Sasinoski issued a gag order in the case, prohibiting prosecutors, defense attorneys and others involved in Bey’s case from speaking outside of court about the case.

In the order, Sasinowski wrote it was being done to ensure that Bey receives a fair trial and that statements outside of court or release of evidence before the trial doesn’t contaminate the jury pool.

The next pre-trial conference is set for Friday.

The move is the latest to keep the case under wraps.

Bey has been in custody since July 22, the day before Hall’s funeral, but the complaint charging him was sealed. Police requested it be placed under seal because early disclosure of its contents could impact the investigation, they wrote in the criminal complaint.

Hall, 36, died July 17, three days after he was shot on Monticello Street in Homewood. He was off-duty when he was shot, but police officials have said he was acting as a police officer at the time.

This story was updated Sept. 19 to correct the name of the judge who issued the order.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.