Case against a McKeesport man accused in Downtown stabbing heads to court | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Case against a McKeesport man accused in Downtown stabbing heads to court

Tom Davidson
1733754_web1_ptr-stabbing08-080819
Police lead a man suspected in the stabbing near Smithfield St. and Sixth Ave. to a cruiser outside of Police Headquarters on Aug. 8, 2019.
1733754_web1_James-Wyatt-stabbing-suspect
James Wyatt, 23 of McKeesport is charged with homicide and other crimes in connection with the stabbing.
1733754_web1_ptr-stabbing01-080819A
Police work the scene of a reported stabbing near Smithfield St. and Sixth Ave. on Aug. 8, 2019.

The case against a McKeesport man accused in an Aug. 8 double stabbing Downtown that killed one woman and injured another will move to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, a Pittsburgh district judge ruled Friday.

James Wyatt, 23, had a preliminary hearing Friday.

He is charged with homicide, aggravated assault and a weapons violation.

Wyatt is accused of killing Janice Purdue-Dance, 61, of Erie, by stabbing her twice in the neck. Police say that Wyatt attacked her while she was unconscious and being checked by a Pittsburgh police officer, who found her at a bus stop at Sixth Avenue and Smithfield Street. Wyatt then stabbed another woman before he was subdued by the officer, according to a criminal complaint.

Purdue-Dance died at UPMC Mercy Hospital. The other woman was treated for non-life-threatening injuries, police said.

The stabbings were an apparent random act of violence, Pittsburgh police violent crimes unit Commander Victor Joseph said at the time.

Wyatt is being defended by Blaine Jones, who didn’t immediately respond to requests seeking comment.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.