Jury convicts Duquesne man for supplying drugs that caused 2017 overdose death | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Jury convicts Duquesne man for supplying drugs that caused 2017 overdose death

Tom Davidson
1665469_web1_ptr-Saunderstrial02-091119
Courtesy of Allegheny County Jail
Tyree Marce Saunders

An Allegheny County jury deliberated about three hours before convicting a Duquesne man for supplying the drugs that caused a Clairton man’s 2017 overdose death.

It was the first such jury conviction since a 2011 change in state law made it possible to charge someone in a fatal drug overdose even if the intent wasn’t to kill the person, according to District Attorney’s office spokesman Mike Manko.

Others have pleaded guilty to the charge of drug delivery resulting in death or pleaded to lesser charges.

Tyree Marce Saunders, 27, was found guilty of supplying the fentanyl that was sold as heroin that killed 27-year-old Jeremy Clark. His trial started Tuesday.

Clark bought the drugs from Saunders and police used the dead man’s cellphone to trace them to Saunders. Police arranged another drug deal with Saunders and arrested him.

The stamp bags Saunders sold were marketed as heroin, but lab tests revealed they were pure fentanyl, police said in a criminal complaint.

Saunders’ attorney, Joseph Horowitz, declined to comment on the case.

Saunders will be sentenced Dec. 5 by Judge David Cashman.

In June, a jury was deadlocked in a similar case involving a Richland man who supplied the heroin that killed a McCandless man in 2016. Robert Keller, 32, pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in that case and was sentenced to between two and a half to five years in prison.

Keller’s case was the first to be heard by a jury on the charge, Manko said.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.