ShareThis Page
Jury of 6 men, 6 women seated for Michael Rosfeld homicide trial | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Jury of 6 men, 6 women seated for Michael Rosfeld homicide trial

Megan Guza
| Wednesday, March 13, 2019 10:06 a.m
875104_web1_MRosfeldC-031319
AP
Former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld, charged with homicide in the shooting death of Antwon Rose II, arrives at the Dauphin County Courthouse in Harrisburg on Tuesday, March 12, 2019.
875104_web1_ptr-rosfeldjury0101-031319
Megan Guza | Tribune-Review
Former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld, flanked by an investigator and his defense attorney, Patrick Thomassey, arrives at the Dauphin County Courthouse in Harrisburg for jury selection in the homicide case against him on Tuesday, March 12, 2019.

HARRISBURG — Attorneys zipped through the last leg of the jury selection process in the Michael Rosfeld case Wednesday morning, seating the final three jurors and four alternates in less than 90 minutes.

The jury is made up of six men and six women, including one black man and two black women.

The four alternates are three men and one woman. All 16 will be bused to Allegheny County on Monday for the Tuesday morning start of the homicide trial against the former East Pittsburgh police officer.

Rosfeld is charged in the June 19 killing of 17-year-old Antwon Rose as he fled a felony traffic stop in East Pittsburgh. Rose was black and unarmed. Rosfeld is white.

The second day of jury selection in Dauphin County began at about 8:40 a.m. with more arguing between prosecutors and defense attorneys when Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Judge Alexander Bicket upheld his own ruling from the day before in favor of prosecutors’ so-called “Batson” challenge.

Such a challenge lets one side object to the validity of the other side’s attempt to remove a potential juror based on race, ethnicity or sex. Defense attorney Patrick Thomassey had dismissed a 55-year-old black woman Tuesday based on her inner-city neighborhood.

Bicket upheld the prosecution’s challenge at the time but said he wanted to read more case law on the matter. He doubled down on his decision Wednesday morning. The woman was seated as the eighth juror.

Thomassey said the decision is a denial of Rosfeld’s right to remove jurors, and he attempted to dismiss the woman because he felt it was in the best interest of his client.

He alleged that prosecutors were calling him racist — “I have never had that said about me,” he exclaimed — and pointed out that his sister-in-law is African-American.

“I’m this close to saying I want off this case,” he said, holding two fingers mere centimeters apart.

Bicket told him that his objections were noted.

The jurors selected Wednesday morning are:

• A middle-aged white man with two grown children who operates heavy equipment for a living

• A 26-year-old married white man with a toddler daughter and who works as a budget analyst for the state government

• A 41-year-old white man who works in a Harrisburg bar

The juror interview process picked up with a middle-aged man who’d been asked to come back Wednesday after clarifying with his employer as to whether he’d still get paid during jury duty. A heavy equipment operator, the man said he feels “that everybody in this country lies,” but “not all the time.”

He became the 10th juror.

The next man, a 26-year-old budget analyst for the state government, said he’d never heard of the case, and he’d never had a bad experience with police. He, too, was seated on the jury.

One man was dismissed for hardship reasons because he takes a diuretic daily.

The final juror, a 41-year-old man working as a bar back, said he heard a brief blurb about the jury selection on the news and then made it a point not to seek out more information in the case — just in case he was chosen for the jury, he said.

Nine jurors were selected Tuesday.

The four alternate jurors are:

  • A 45-year-old white man who works in distribution and has two children, ages 17 and 15
  • A 50-year-old unmarried white man with no children who works as a service writer at an auto dealership
  • A 28-year-old white woman with a 9-year-old child who works in scheduling at a nursing home
  • A 47-year-old white man who worked as a civilian with police at the University of Illinois in the 1990s and currently works as an architect with Tesla

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, mguza@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.