Kennywood to bring back Heinz ketchup |

Kennywood to bring back Heinz ketchup

Natasha Lindstrom
Hunt’s and Heinz ketchups are the subject of ire among some Kennywood Park guests, with the park having switched from the latter to the former.

The Kennywood ketchup controversy is over.

Heinz is returning to the West Mifflin amusement park, along with Sandcastle and Idlewild & SoakZone.

“Kennywood has had the honor to be in business for the past 120 years because of our guests,” park officials said in a statement Wednesday. “We value and understand Pittsburgh’s pride and passion for preserving traditions, including supporting our hometown businesses. And after looking in Heinz sight at our decision, we are pleased to announce we will serve Pittsburgh’s favorite ketchup at Kennywood Park, Idlewild and Sandcastle.”

Heinz ketchup is expected to be back by this weekend, though it could take until early next week, Kennywood spokesman Chris Salerno said.

Residents were outraged last month when they learned Kennywood had switched condiment loyalties from Heinz to Hunt’s.

Someone started an online petition to bring back Heinz. More than 8,500 people had signed the petition as of Wednesday.

On June 1, Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster visited Kennywood with a Heinz Ketchup bottle to offer an alternative to Hunt’s for visitors.

The park opened this season to customer unrest when it was reported the cheese changed at The Potato Patch. Kennywood later revealed it was only testing out a new recipe and quickly restored the beloved cheese sauce.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.