ShareThis Page
Student charged with making threat that shut down Keystone Oaks School District | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Student charged with making threat that shut down Keystone Oaks School District

Madasyn Czebiniak
770350_web1_ptr-keystonethreat-022019
WPXI-TV
Keystone Oaks School District’s Myrtle Elementary School on Myrtle Avenue in Castle Shannon.

Police have charged a Keystone Oaks student with making violent, online threats that shut down the school district Tuesday, school and police officials said.

The student, a juvenile who police did not identify, admitted to posting the threat in a YouTube Live Stream, according to Mt. Lebanon police Deputy Chief Jason Haberman.

Superintendent William Stropkaj said in a statement that the student said he never intended to hurt anyone.

Stropkaj said that Mt. Lebanon police alerted the district to the threat early Tuesday, around the same time someone submitted a report through the district’s Safe2Say Something system, which allows anyone to report threats or warning signs of violence anonymously.

The child, from Green Tree, is charged as a juvenile with making terroristic threats, Haberman said.

Keystone Oaks school buildings will open Tuesday afternoon for normal, pre-scheduled events and meetings, Stropkaj said, including the school board meeting and WPIAL basketball playoffs.

Staff writer Megan Guza contributed to this report.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.