Last of 9 indicted in Pittsburgh federal court enters guilty plea to selling crack cocaine |

Last of 9 indicted in Pittsburgh federal court enters guilty plea to selling crack cocaine

Chuck Biedka

The last suspect accused by the Drug Enforcement Administration in a 2016 drug conspiracy has pleaded guilty.

Mark Fisher, 40, of Pittsburgh is the last of nine people to admit guilt to taking part in the cocaine conspiracy.

Fisher entered the plea last Wednesday before U.S. District Judge David Stewart Cercone.

Prosecutors allege that between April 2016 and October the same year Fisher and others sold crack cocaine.

Judge Cercone scheduled Fisher’s sentencing for July 23.

Fisher could be sentenced to a minimum of five years and up to 40 years in federal prison, and a large fine. His sentencing will depend on the seriousness of the charges and any previous criminal record.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric G. Olshan is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

A federal Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force conducted the investigation in this case.

The DEA headed the investigation and it had assistance from officers in Baldwin, McKees Rocks, Munhall and Stowe police departments, as well as Pittsburgh and state police and the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.