Lawrenceville added to National Register of Historic places |

Lawrenceville added to National Register of Historic places

Bob Bauder
The Doughboy statue on Butler Street in Lawrenceville.

The U.S. Department of the Interior has added Lawrenceville — one of Pittsburgh’s oldest and trendiest neighborhoods — to the National Register of Historic Places.

Sarah Quinn, the city’s historic preservation planner, said the designation carries no restrictions for private property owners. Certain eligible buildings being rehabilitated or redeveloped would be eligible for historic tax credits, she added.

“National Register nomination and listing is purely honorary,” she said. “There are no restrictions on private property owners at all.”

Lawrenceville, founded in 1814, includes 916 acres along the Allegheny River from the Strip District to the 62nd Street Bridge. The bustling neighborhood includes such historic resources as Allegheny Cemetery dating to 1844 and remnants of the Allegheny Arsenal, which helped supply the Union Army during the Civil War.

“Lawrenceville was built into one of the city’s greatest neighborhoods through the hard work of generations of those who came before us,” said Pittsburgh City Councilwoman Deb Gross, who represents the neighborhood. “Our challenge now is to protect it for generations to come.”

The nomination was written by Angelique Bamberg of Clio Consulting, Jesse Belfast of Michael Baker International and the late Carol Peterson, a historian, writer and preservationist who lived in Lawrenceville.

“This project wouldn’t have been anywhere near as successful without (Peterson’s) vast knowledge of Lawrenceville history,” Quinn said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-564-3080, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.