ShareThis Page
Pitt lawyers say East Pittsburgh never requested Michael Rosfeld’s employee file from Pitt | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pitt lawyers say East Pittsburgh never requested Michael Rosfeld’s employee file from Pitt

Megan Guza
| Friday, March 15, 2019 1:34 p.m
888198_web1_MRosfeldD-031319
AP
Former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld, charged with homicide in the shooting death of Antwon Rose II, walks to the Dauphin County Courthouse in Harrisburg, Pa., Tuesday, March 12, 2019.

The borough of East Pittsburgh hired Michael Rosfeld as a police officer without asking for employment records from at least one of his previous departments, according to a civil court filing last week in a lawsuit related to his killing of Antwon Rose.

Rose’s parents — Michelle Kenney and Antwon Rose Sr. — filed a lawsuit late last year against the University of Pittsburgh, contending the university is partially responsible for their son’s death by not firing Rosfeld when he worked for campus police between 2012 and early 2018.

The lawsuit further claimed that the university failed to divulge alleged blemishes on Rosfeld’s employment record.

In a filing March 7 by Pitt attorney’s Jonathan Marcus and Jeremy Engle, the university denies most claims made in the Rose family’s lawsuit but goes on to say that “East Pittsburgh did not request from the University a copy of Rosfeld’s employee file” and “East Pittsburgh hired Rosfeld without reviewing Rosfeld’s employee file maintained by the University.”

Attorneys for the university also contend that Rosfeld “did not engage in any violent misconduct” while he was a campus officer, and they note that he hadn’t worked for the university in the five months leading up to the June 19 shooting.

Rosfeld opened fire on Rose and another teenager as they fled a felony traffic stop in East Pittsburgh. He stopped the car because it matched the description of the suspect vehicle in a drive-by shooting minutes earlier in North Braddock.

East Pittsburgh officials could not be reached for comment. A notice on the borough website indicated that their offices are closed on Fridays.

Rosfeld worked as a part-time officer for Oakmont from 2011 to 2013 and worked for less than a year as a part-timer for Harmar about five years ago.

Harmar Chief Jason Domaratz said in an email that East Pittsburgh officials did not reach out to his department prior to hiring Rosfeld. He pointed out that Rosfeld worked there for only about five months.

Oakmont Chief Mike Ford could not immediately be reached for comment.

Rose’s family also filed a wrongful death lawsuit against East Pittsburgh council, Mayor Louis Payne and former police Chief Lori Fruncek. East Pittsburgh police disbanded late last year.

That lawsuit, in part, alleges the borough had no process in place to properly vet Rosfeld before hiring him and should have known about previous incidents in which he had been involved as an officer elsewhere.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, mguza@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.