Lawsuit seeks to remove Allegheny County Jail inmate from solitary |

Lawsuit seeks to remove Allegheny County Jail inmate from solitary

Megan Guza

Lawyers for a 20-year-old Pittsburgh woman are asking a federal judge to force Allegheny County Jail officials to remove her from solitary confinement, according to a lawsuit filed Monday.

Kimberly Andrews is awaiting a bench trial later this month on two misdemeanor charges of theft and access device fraud, court records show.

The lawsuit said Andrews has been in Allegheny County Jail since Feb. 8 when she was extradited from Georgia to face charges in three separate cases: a summary charge of disorderly conduct; theft and fraud misdemeanors; and misdemeanor resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.

The summary charge was withdrawn, and Andrews pleaded guilty to resisting arrest. She was sentenced to 30 to 60 days in jail on March 11, court records show. Her trial for theft and fraud is scheduled for June 20.

The lawsuit alleged a range of abuses, chief among them that she was placed in solitary confinement for 70 days despite mental health concerns and numerous suicide attempts.

Allegheny County spokeswoman Amie Downs declined comment, citing the pending litigation.

Andrews suffers from bipolar and other disorders, according to the lawsuit, and solitary confinement leaves inmates alone in a cell for 23 hours per day.

The lawsuit alleges staff indifference to Andrews’ requests for mental health treatment, including one alleged instance in which she claimed a corrections officer encouraged her to kill herself.

The lawsuit names Warden Orlando Harper, Chief Deputy Wardens David Zetwo and Laura Williams, Deputy Warden Jason Beasom and a correctional officer identified only as Rhodes.

The lawsuit seeks a jury trial and a restraining order keeping Andrews from solitary confinement, as well as attorneys fees.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.