ShareThis Page
Lawsuits against Pittsburgh mounting following passage of gun legislation | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Lawsuits against Pittsburgh mounting following passage of gun legislation

Bob Bauder
1005356_web1_PTR-GunbillSigned01-041019
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto signs multiple gun legislation bills during a signing ceremony inside of the City-County Building on April 9, 2019. Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto signed controversial gun legislation on Wednesday, promoting gun rights supporters to sue the city.

Second Amendment advocates filed two more lawsuits contending Pittsburgh’s gun ban violates the Pennsylvania Constitution and are seeking to have Mayor Bill Peduto and six city council members held in contempt.

The suits were filed Tuesday in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court by attorney Joshua Prince on behalf of multiple groups, including Firearm Owners Against Crime and the Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League, and area residents Fred Rak and Saadyah Averick, both of Pittsburgh, and Matthew Boarderly of Avella, who serves as an area director for Landmark Security at Heinz Field, Stage AE and the A.J. Palumbo Center.

One is a petition seeking to have Peduto and council members Bruce Kraus, Ricky Burgess, R. Daniel Lavelle, Deb Gross, Corey O’Connor and Erika Strassburger held in contempt of court for approving the legislation despite the state preemption law and a 1995 court order.

The second is a complaint alleging Pittsburgh’s gun bills approved by council last week and signed by Peduto on Wednesday are unconstitutional and violate the state law. The bans take effect in 60 days.

Both ask the court to declare the gun bills illegal and order Peduto and the council members to pay all legal fees incurred by the city and plaintiffs and any fines levied against the city. Four city residents with help from the National Rifle Association also sued the city Tuesday seeking a similar outcome.

Peduto was unavailable for comment. He was in Toledo on Wednesday attending a U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting on strategies to reduce gun violence. Peduto spokesman Tim McNulty declined comment.

“We knew there was going to be a challenge,” said Councilman Corey O’Connor, one of the prime sponsors of the gun legislation.”They have every right to do it. Those individuals who don’t think there’s a problem with gun violence in this city and country need to look in the mirror and think about how they can solve this problem instead of blaming people who want to make a change.”

In addition to lawsuits, Peduto is facing a challenge from a Butler County legislator who wants to have him impeached.

State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry, tweeted that he is consulting an attorney about impeachment.

Peduto fired back on Twitter.

This is the second time Peduto has been threatened with impeachment over the gun bills. Brooke Nadonley of Pittsburgh’s Mt. Washington neighborhood in January attempted to file court petitions calling for the mayor’s impeachment.

Courts have ruled that only the Pennsylvania General Assembly can impeach an elected official “for any misbehavior in office,” but it’s happened only twice in state history.

A majority in the state House would first have to vote on articles of impeachment against Peduto. If successful, the Senate would have to convene a trial and convict Peduto through a vote of at least two-thirds of the members, according to the state Constitution.

Threats of impeachment in January didn’t stop Peduto from supporting the gun legislation.

“Arrest me. Sue me. Impeach me,” the mayor tweeted at the time. “I was elected to protect my constituents and that is exactly what I will do.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.