Man claims Pittsburgh K-9 attacked him, witness says it was his fault | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Man claims Pittsburgh K-9 attacked him, witness says it was his fault

Bob Bauder
973644_web1_k9
Pittsburgh Police Facebook
Pittsburgh is poised to settle a lawsuit filed by a North Side man, alleging he was injured in an unprovoked attack by a city K9 in 2016. Pittsburgh is poised to settle a lawsuit filed by a North Side man alleging he was injured in an unprovoked attack by a city K9 in 2016.

Pittsburgh would pay a North Side man $5,400 to settle a federal lawsuit alleging a city police dog attacked and injured him after he reported a 2016 break-in at an auto shop.

The shop owner, however, said the man — not the dog — was at fault for being bitten.

Timothy Arnold, of Fineview, alleged in the lawsuit that he reported a break-in at Nothin But Juice Customs’ vehicle impound lot in East Allegheny around 3 a.m. on May 23, 2016.

When Officer Robert Stroschein arrived, he instructed Arnold to stand a block away while his K-9 named Ben searched the lot, according to the lawsuit. Arnold claims he was still standing about a block away when the dog left the lot, approached him and bit him on both arms despite Stroschein’s commands to stop.

Richard Bowers, 45, the shop owner, said he and at least one other employee were standing with Arnold, who worked for him as a tow truck driver but has since taken another job.

He said Stroschein instructed the group to stand still when the dog approached, but Arnold lowered his arm and the dog bit him.

“The dog didn’t bother us,” Bowers said. “He sniffed all of us as soon as he got to us, and Timmy leans his arm down. The dog went up his arm like corn on the cob. That was his own dumb fault.”

Neither Arnold nor his attorneys, Michael Metro and James Villanova, returned messages seeking comment.

Police didn’t find anyone in the lot during the search, Bowers said.

Arnold suffered puncture wounds to both arms and required stitches along with severe sprains, shock and injuries to his spine, according to the suit. The lawsuit contends the injuries were the result of Stroschein’s negligence.

Tim McNulty, spokesman for Mayor Bill Peduto, declined to comment. Pittsburgh City Council in a preliminary vote Wednesday unanimously approved payment of the settlement. A final vote is expected on Tuesday.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.