Man who fell asleep in Carrick dumpster rescued from garbage truck | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Man who fell asleep in Carrick dumpster rescued from garbage truck

Tom Davidson
1649698_web1_sig-garbage-050219
Tribune-Review
A Republic Services garbage truck is picured in this file photo.

A man sleeping in a dumpster in Carrick woke up Monday morning in the back of a garbage truck and had to be rescued, Pittsburgh Public Safety spokeswoman Cara Cruz said.

The man, who wasn’t identified by police, had lost track of a friend, needed a place to sleep and decided to use a dumpster in the 2100 block of Brownsville Road, Cruz said he told police.

A driver for Republic Services called authorities to assist at about 3:30 a.m. when he emptied the dumpster into his truck and heard the man screaming. The driver called 911 because he couldn’t get the man out of the truck on his own.

Firefighters were able to get the man out, and he was transported to UPMC Mercy hospital where he was treated for minor injuries to his face and knee, Cruz said.

It’s not common for people to get dumped into garbage trucks, but it does happen on occasion, Republic said in a statement.

“Our drivers notify their supervisors and the local authorities right away when this happens,” the company said.

Drivers work to make sure the person is safe when it happens, the statement said, although it didn’t detail what’s done.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.