Cops: Men fired guns near Coraopolis police station |

Cops: Men fired guns near Coraopolis police station

Jacob Tierney

Police arrested two men and are looking for a third who they say repeatedly fired guns near the Coraopolis police station early Tuesday morning.

Nobody was hurt, according to police.

Coraopolis police officers heard the first gunshots as they left their station around 3:15 a.m., said Sgt. Robert Litterini.

After a few minutes, they heard additional shots.

The shots were coming from near the Montour Industrial Park, about 200 yards behind the station on the bank of the Ohio River.

Officers moved toward the industrial park, hearing more shots as they went. They could hear voices and twigs snapping, but couldn’t see the shooters, Litterini said. They called in police from Moon Township, Ohio Township and Robinson Township as backup. They also called in the Coraopolis Fire Department, which has an infrared imaging device they hoped to use to spot the shooters.

Once all the officers were in place, just as the sun rose, they moved in and apprehended two men on the industrial park property, Litterini said.

It appeared the men had been shooting across the river, in the direction of the Robert Morris University Island Sports Center, on Neville Island.

Police have not identified the men. It is not clear why they were shooting or what they were trying to strike, Litterini said.

Officers seized a 12-gauge shotgun. There were multiple .40 caliber shell casings found on the scene, but police did not find a corresponding weapon.

Police believe the weapon is likely in the possession of a third man who is believed to have left the scene before officers arrived.

Charges are pending. Litterini said police likely will charge the men with possessing a prohibited offensive weapon and recklessly endangering another person.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.