Monroeville residents propose oil and gas ordinance |

Monroeville residents propose oil and gas ordinance

Dillon Carr
A drilling rig towers over the walls of Huntley & Huntley Energy Exploration’s Poseidon well pad in Penn Township, as seen on Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018.

A group of Monroeville residents has drafted an ordinance that places strict limits on oil and gas activity within the municipality and called on council to enact it.

Sustainable Monroeville and Food & Water Watch, both environmental advocacy groups, drafted the 21-page ordinance that tightens up rules surrounding oil and gas development, said Lois Drumheller of Sustainable Monroeville.

The ordinance, in part, sanctions oil and gas activity to M-2 industrial zoning districts, places a 2,500-foot setback on all structures, sets a minimum of 10 acres for all land intended to be used for oil and gas development, and requires operators to conduct pre- and post-drilling tests of nearby water, soil and air.

Monroeville resident David Mintz has asked council when representatives of council and Sustainable Monroeville could meet to discuss the group’s ordinance and when the group could expect a vote to advertise it.

Mayor Nick Gresock said “perhaps” members of council, the solicitor and members from Sustainable Monroeville could meet to discuss the particulars of the ordinance before October’s meeting.

Manager Tim Little said it would need to undergo a review by the municipal solicitor, Bob Wratcher. After that, he said, the planning commission would review it.

“And it gets to council’s bench, so to speak, and a public hearing has to be held. And then it needs to be advertised and a public hearing,” Little said, adding a second public hearing is only necessary when there are substantial amendments made to proposed ordinances.

The group’s proposal comes nearly two years after council updated its zoning ordinance, which previously allowed oil and gas activity in every zoning district as a conditional use.

The ordinance, passed in October 2017, limited oil and gas drilling to M-2 industrial zoning district as a conditional use.

Three months later, council presented another ordinance that limited all oil and gas development to a 150-acre special conservancy zoning district, where a Waste Management landfill is located. The ordinance included regulations for operations such as compressor stations, well pads, impoundments and other activities.

Council later voted unanimously to withdraw the proposed ordinance after residents complained it invited fracking by accommodating companies that might want to develop wells on the landfill property – namely, Huntley & Huntley, a gas developer based in Monroeville. The company has a lease agreement at the Waste Management property.

Huntley & Huntley has said it has no plans to drill at the Monroeville landfill.

Council’s move meant the municipality’s zoning law reverted back to the one enacted in October 2017 that limited the activity to industrial zoning districts.

There are three such districts in Monroeville. They include an area of the near Broadway Boulevard (Rt. 130), Mosside Boulevard (Rt. 48) and an area near the Parkway East, Rt. 22 and Thompson Run Road.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.