ShareThis Page
Mt. Lebanon couple sues Hitchhiker Brewing, claims it’s a nuisance |

Mt. Lebanon couple sues Hitchhiker Brewing, claims it’s a nuisance

Paul Guggenheimer
| Monday, January 7, 2019 4:10 p.m

A Mt. Lebanon couple is suing a brewery that recently received national accolades contending its local pub brings large crowds, parking problems and unruly behavior to the community.

Hitchhiker has become “a victim of their own success,” according to attorney Robert Goldman who represents the couple living near the taproom in Mt. Lebanon.

Husband and wife Jason Sheraw and Adelle Nalevanko claim Hitchhiker’s pub on Castle Shannon Boulevard does not limit the number of customers who patronize the taproom, leading to rowdiness. Examples cited in the lawsuit include public urination, trespassing and trash on their property along with loud noise and parking issues.

Hitchhiker Brewing Company and the solicitor for Mt. Lebanon did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The lawsuit was filed Jan. 2 in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court.

Two weeks ago, Hitchhiker was named “One of the Best Breweries to Watch in 2019” by online magazine Hop Culture.

Goldman said Hitchhiker Brewing Company’s building has outgrown the zoning classification for the area and its nearby residential neighborhoods and that Mt. Lebanon officials are not taking any enforcement action.

Hitchhiker Brewing opened its Mt. Lebanon location in 2016 and ran a brewery and taproom from there. The brewery moved to Sharpsburg in 2017, and the Mt. Lebanon location maintains a pub.

“I believe the occupancy permit limits it to 22 persons and if you kept it to that, you probably wouldn’t disrupt the neighborhood,” Goldman said. “But because they’ve outgrown that location, they’ve got tables on the exterior now and they’ve got more people outside than inside and it’s that crowd noise, that crowd trespassing on the neighbor’s property that is leading to these complaints.”

Also named in the lawsuit is Mt. Lebanon for allegedly failing to protect the property rights of residents, namely Sheraw and Nalevanko, and approving the occupancy permit for Hitchhiker Brewery to sell alcoholic beverages from the Mt. Lebanon location with the “full knowledge that (the) defendant did not possess a Restaurant type liquor license.”

“We’re alleging that the owners of the property knew all along that this was a brewery and that it was not going to be operated as a quiet restaurant,” said Goldman. “If you have 80 people outside and 20 people inside, the problem you have is the bathrooms which are on the inside. You have one toilet for a female and one toilet for a male. If there’s 20 people maybe you’re okay but if you’ve got 100, I don’t think that’s enough bathroom space which leads to my clients’ complaints.”

Paul Guggenheimer is a freelance writer.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.