ShareThis Page
Munhall man gets almost 8 years for having heroin, stolen pistol | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Munhall man gets almost 8 years for having heroin, stolen pistol

Chuck Biedka
1187929_web1_WEB-pittsburgh-federal-court-building

A Munhall man found in 2018 with a large garbage bag filled with bricks of heroin, and a little more than $25,000 was sentenced Tuesday to serve almost 8 years in federal prison for possession of heroin with intent to distribute it and illegal gun possession, federal authorities said.

Senior U.S. District Judge Donetta W. Ambrose sentenced Charles Payne, 26, to 7.5 years.

He was also ordered to serve six years of supervised release after the prison sentence .

He was indicted by a Pittsburgh federal grand jury in March 2018 and pleaded guilty in November.

Payne has been in detention since arrested.

In a statement, U.S. Attorney Scott Brady said Allegheny County police helped Munhall police search a Martha Street house.

Police said they found Payne, the heroin, money and gun in the house.

Lab tests revealed that the substances seized during the search were heroin and a type of fentanyl.

Police also found two digital scales, three boxes of ammunition, a laser sight and a loaded stolen handgun. Payne had previously been convicted on a state charge for drug trafficking and was prohibited from possessing any firearms.

According to prosecutors, Payne agreed to forfeit a .45-caliber pistol and ammunition, more than $25,000 in cash and all drugs and paraphernalia in 2018.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.